A couple of weeks ago, London's Telegraph speculated that Sarah Palin was a blank slate for the neoconservatives. (Seems the Brits watch
our neoconservatives more closely than the American media does.) It's easy to dismiss her as a relatively harmless hockey mom -- a nice lady with lots of common sense -- but one comment in the debates the other night got me thinking: maybe everyone is underestimating this lady.
The New York Times talks about it here.
"In all the talk about the vice-presidential debate, there was an
issue that did not get much attention but kept nagging at us: Sarah
Palin’s description of the role and the responsibilities of the office
for which she is running, vice president of the United States.
In Thursday night’s debate, Ms. Palin was asked about the vice
president’s role in government. She said she agreed with Dick Cheney
that “we have a lot of flexibility in there” under the Constitution.
And she declared that she was “thankful that the Constitution would
allow a bit more authority given to the vice president also, if that
vice president so chose to exert it.”"
Read the rest.
For a quick lesson in Neocon 101, check out wikipedia or the Christian Science Monitor.